AFM RSS Feed Follow Us on Twitter       
AMERICAN FOOTBALL MONTHLY THE #1 RESOURCE FOR FOOTBALL COACHES
ABOUT |  CONTACT |  ADVERTISE |  HELP  



   User Name    Password 
      Password Help





Article Categories


AFM Magazine

AFM Magazine


Stopping Power: Part I – Basics of the 4-2-5

by: Frank DiCocco
Assistant Coach and Player Development Director, Stillman College
© More from this issue

Click for Printer Friendly Version          

Since the advent of the spread-offense, defensive coordinators at every level have been searching for a way to defend its pass-happy formations, while still being able to stop the run and gain the numbers advantage at the point-of-attack.

Over the past decade, numerous schemes have been devised to stop the newest trends of offensive football. From variations of the traditional 4-3 and 3-4, to the creation of hybrid defenses like the 3-3 and 3-5, defensive signal-callers have come up with a myriad of ways to attack the spread. Perhaps the most effective approach, however, may be one which manages to employ the strengths of each of these defenses, while still being adaptable, learnable, and executable enough to be effective against virtually every style of offensive play.

Enter the 4-2-5 defense.

The 4-2-5 scheme gives a defense the ability to align and match-up well against spread formations, allows it to maintain box-integrity by keeping a numbers advantage near the line-of-scrimmage and point-of-attack, and provides it with a highly-flexible, easily-understandable, and personnel-friendly approach to defending multiple looks from offenses.

The scheme enables defenses to effectively pressure the quarterback, maintain a stout presence against the running game, and create confusion in the minds of offensive coordinators and on-field signal-callers. It creates the potential for generating turnovers and takeaways, while reducing the likelihood of the big play from the offense.

Each of these reasons, along with the relative simplicity of installing this particular brand of defense, makes the 4-2-5 scheme what many call the most effective defense in football.

The Basics

The 4-2-5 scheme utilizes four down-linemen, two inside linebackers, two safeties (which serve as hybrid-outside linebackers), along with two traditional cornerbacks and a free safety. The strength of the defense is that it includes five defensive backs, rather than the conventional four that are employed in the 4-3 and 3-4 alignments. The 4-2-5 can adequately stop the run, apply pressure to the passer, and to match up well against a myriad of spread formations. Its easy implementation and installation process are also a main reason why the 4-2-5 is rapidly gaining in popularity at all levels of play.

Basic Alignment

The base alignment of the 4-2-5 is similar to the 4-4 defense, with the main differences being in personnel. Rather than two outside linebackers, the 4-2-5 employs two additional safeties. Essentially, it is a variation of the Nickel package. However, the added athleticism allows for greater flexibility and versatility in terms of both alignment and coverage.

Along the defensive line, the alignment is the same as that of a traditional 4-man front. Two interior defensive tackles, aligned in a 3-technique to the strong-side and a 1-technique to the weak-side, anchor the defensive line in this particular scheme. The ends are contain players, along with outside pass rushers.

There are two linebackers in the 4-2-5, with the middle linebacker (“The Mike”) aligned over B-gap to the weak-side, and the strong-side linebacker (“The Sam”) aligned in either in a stacked-look over the 3-technique, or over the B-gap to the strong-side. The backers are aligned five yards off the ball, playing what usually amounts to the outside shade of either guard.

Depending on your base alignment and coverage, both a 1-safety-high or 2-safety-high look may be used. In a 1-high look, the free safety would play in the deep middle of the field, while the strong safety and weak safety (often called names like “Rover,” “Hawk,” “Bandit,” or “Joker”) can align to a slot receiver or trips formation, or can walk-up and become edge-of-the-box defenders. In a 2-high look, the weak safety is free to align to a slot receiver, to the pass-strength side, or on the edge of the box as well.

Cornerback alignment in the 4-2-5 can vary, based upon coverage and call. The strong and weak safeties can be set to either the boundary/field-side or the strong or weak side of the formation, depending upon how you choose to determine alignment (See Diagrams 1-3).

Diagram 1.


Diagram 2.


Diagram 3.


Primary Objectives

The 4-2-5 provides a “bend-but-don’t-break” approach that limits scoring and emphasizes stopping the run, while eliminating the ‘big play’ and forcing an offense to execute long drives in order to score. Due to its versatility, and the overall level of athletic ability that it places on the field, the 4-2-5 offers various benefits that can help a defensive coordinator solve many of the problems posed by today’s complex and multidimensional offenses.

The 4-2-5’s strength is its capacity to adjust to multiple formations, adequately address the run, and create a myriad of confusing alignments, pressures, and coverage scenarios for offenses to deal with. It has the ability to align favorably against two-tight-end and heavy sets and also provide a strong presence against the run game, by consistently keeping at least six defenders in the box. The 4-2-5’s personnel also allows for greater flexibility in designing blitz packages and coverage schemes, along with creating an increased ability to disguise pressures and coverages.

Dedrick Dodge, Stillman College’s Defensive Coordinator, finds the 4-2-5 adaptable to any offense. “It matches up extremely well to every offense we face,” said Dodge.” It is essentially a nickel defense, which allows the adjustment to various formations and personnel groupings. The strength of the defense lies in its ability to add an extra defensive back (or two) in order to create a better match-up with the 3 and 4-receiver packages that you see so often.”

Neal Neathery, the Defensive Coordinator at the University of Texas-San Antonio agrees with Dodge. “When run correctly, the 4-2-5 is strong enough to stop the run, and athletic enough to counter the spread offense which has become the weapon of choice today,” said Neathery.

One of the 4-2-5’s greatest strengths is that it allows you to defend all areas of the field, at all times, in both the running and passing games.

Against the Run: By virtue of its ability to maintain 6 defenders in the box, the 4-2-5 is highly-adept at stopping the inside run game. In general, the scheme emphasizes defending the middle of the field, playing from inside-out, and spilling run-plays to the outside. Due to the extra defensive backs on the field (5 defensive backs/athletic defenders), this inside-out approach plays right into the hands of a defense that is predicated on speed. The result: teams have a hard time running their traditional inside plays (especially those often seen in the spread offense) – plays such as the Inside Zone, the Trap, and the A-Gap Power (Fold) play.

Against the Pass: The extra defensive backs, speed and athleticism of the defense as a whole, natural pass rush from the defensive end positions, and myriad of coverages and blitz concepts that can be utilized by the 4-2-5 allow the teams to adapt and defend virtually every type of passing attack – from the 3, 5, and 7-step drop games, to receiver screens, to sprint-outs – and gives a defense the ability to successfully defend every zone of the field, while still being able to effectively pressure the quarterback. It also allows a defense to play press and jam techniques on receivers at the line-of-scrimmage, disrupting the timing of routes, and distorting the spacing of various route-concepts in the short and intermediate zones. The result: more incompletions, more interceptions, more quarterback-pressures, more sacks, more turnovers, more 3-and-out’s. And, most importantly, fewer points.

A Profile In Strength: Another one of the 4-2-5’s strengths lies in its ability to cover up for personnel weaknesses and individual limitations.
Doing More with Less: Unlike the 3-4 scheme (where you almost have to have a space-eater at the nose-guard position) and unlike the 4-3 scheme (where you have to have that true 3-technique and middle-linebacker) with the 4-2-5, you are much more able to hide weaker players and compensate for them with athleticism at other positions and the overall flexibility and unpredictability of the scheme. The 4-2-5 enables you to play alignment and assignment sound defensive football, with personnel that might otherwise be exploited in other schemes. In essence, you can do things with guys who are limited physically, intellectually, or in terms of their experience level, and do them well.

Along the front four, you generally need to have only one “true” defensive lineman – this being your strong-side 3-technique – along with another defensive linemen that can also be a smaller and quicker guy, playing the weak shaded nose.

At the linebacker level, the presence of four down linemen helps create an effective pass rush, while also occupying offensive linemen and helping to keep linebackers clean and free to make plays. The presence of five defensive backs behind the linebackers provides for adequate coverage in the passing game, limiting the amount of time that linebackers need to cover, and the amount of space that they need to account for in their zone-responsibilities.

In the secondary, the luxury of having five defensive backs enables you to disguise coverages, roll coverages, and exchange responsibilities and allow players – especially cornerbacks – to play to their strengths and away from their weaknesses. Sky and Cloud coverage variations, along with the Robber scheme, are great ways to mix-up alignment and assignment looks, and hiding weaknesses in the defensive secondary.
Hiding Your Weaknesses: The ability to hide weaknesses and to cover-up shortcomings in personnel, makes the 4-2-5 an attractive style of defense for any coach who lacks the overall talent or depth to play more conventional schemes. By being able to compensate for problem areas, and reducing the size of potential “holes” in the defense, the 4-2-5 dramatically decreases the likelihood of big plays from opposing offenses. Its ability to cover up weaknesses and minimize an overall lacks in both talent and depth, make it especially suitable for implementation at the high school level.

Compensating for the Weaknesses of the 4-2-5

Despite its many advantages, the 4-2-5 scheme does have some inherent weaknesses, in terms of both alignment and overall structure. Due to its flexibility and design, however, these weaknesses can be easily compensated for. They can effectively be covered up to a large degree.

Among the scheme’s weaknesses is that it is often susceptible to weak-side running plays, particularly the speed-option and QB read-counter plays. However, because of the speed and athleticism of the on-field personnel, this weakness is not as pronounced as it otherwise would be in a typical 4-3 scheme.

Another weakness of the 4-2-5 is that it tends to be susceptible to the 3-step and quick passing games. This can be compensated for by varying coverages to include forms of press, bump-and-run, Cloud, and Robber techniques. Another weakness is the vulnerability to crossing routes. Again, the speed of the secondary can help reduce the effectiveness of such routes, shortening the yards-after-catch on shallow-routes, digs, and drags.

Perhaps the most-pronounced weakness of the 4-2-5 scheme is the size disadvantages created by a two-tight-end set (such as the Ace formation). Larger tight ends can exploit potential size advantages against nickel backs or smaller defensive backs. However, due to the number of defenders in the secondary, and the overall speed and athleticism of those defenders, tight ends will be limited to short and intermediate gains, and almost never will be able to run unchecked vertically or in the openfield.

The 4-2-5 allows you to keep 6 men in the box at all times, maintaining the same gap responsibilities, regardless of offensive formation. You can use a variety of defenses fronts and line stunts, as well, without sacrificing much with regard to the linebackers or secondary.

Most teams are going to face everything from spread offensive attacks to Wing-T, Double Wing, I-formation and anything else. The 4-2-5 is easy to adapt to all of these, since that 6-man box never has to change a bit. You can use a wide variety of blitzes, as well as any coverage under the sun. Simple for your guys, complex for the opponent, and adaptable to anybody.

Next Month: Part II of the 4-2-5 defense includes a detailed look at personnel profiles, blitz packages, and three different coverages.






NEW BOOK!

AFM Videos Streaming Memberships Now Available Digital Download - 304 Pages of Football Forms for the Winning Coach



















HOME
MAGAZINE
SUBSCRIBE ONLINE COLUMNISTS COACHING VIDEOS


Copyright 2024, AmericanFootballMonthly.com
All Rights Reserved